Know more. The Court had before it numerous exhibits and witnesses. The witnesses included both the parties, each party's mother, the Defendant's sister, the Family Relations Officer, Valerie Quarles, who did the custody evaluation, a police officer, two DCF workers, three different mental health professionals who worked with the parties, Maureen Cassidy, Antionette Foster, and Jennifer Champagne.
The Court has carefully considered the statutory criteria for the granting of dissolution of marriage orders pertaining to custody, visitation, parenting access, and alike, alimony, child support, property settlement, attorney fees and issues such as health insurance, life insurance, and educational support orders.
After careful consideration of the statutory and case law criteria the Court makes the following findings and orders:. The parties were married in Seymour, Connecticut on March 20, Two minor children have been born to the wife since the date of the marriage.
There are no other minor children who have been born to the wife since the date of the marriage. She's not currently pregnant. The parties have not been recipient to public assistance, and each party has resided in the State of Connecticut continuously for more than one year prior to the bringing of this action.
For the reasons stated here and after, the Court does find the marriage between the parties has broken down irretrievably, and there is no reasonable hope of its reconciliation. The Plaintiff, David Hagen, was born on January 27, He is thirty-nine years old and in good health.
